(1.) IT appears that there are some clerical errors in the judgment of this court dated 18th August, 1966. At page 12 of the judgment, following observations have been made: -
(2.) IT is found this observation was not factually correct and appears to have been mistyped because the trial court had actually accepted the plea of insanity and decreed the plaintiffâ„¢s suit and the plea of insanity was reversed by the lower appellate court (District Judge Srinagar). Counsel for the parties conceded that this mistake is there.
(3.) IN these circumstances, I would direct that in the judgment of the court noted above, instead of the words mentioned above, the following words should be deemed to have been there: -