(1.) THESE two references arise almost out of the same facts and will be disposed of by one judgment.
(2.) THE references relate to the assessment years 1965-66 and 1966-67. THE facts giving rise to these references may be briefly summarised as follows :
(3.) FINALLY, Mr. H, L. Bhagotra, appearing for the assessee, submitted that after M/s. Kashmir Fruit and Chemical Industries started manufacture of alcoholic spirits after taking a licence from the Government in 1961, it became a new undertaking and was, therefore, entitled to the benefit conferred on such an undertaking by Section 84(2)(ii) of the Income-tax Act. It was argued that even if the new company be deemed to be a continuation of the old company, since a new business had been started, the assessee was entitled to tax holiday under Section 84 of the Income-tax Act. In view of the finding of fact arrived at by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner as also the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, we refrain from making any observation on this aspect of the matter.