(1.) RESPONDENTS filed a suit for eviction in respect of shop situated at Batmaloo Srinagar and for recovery of arrears of rent at against the revision petitioner -defendant. The suit was decree in ex -parte on 30.5.2002 by 2nd Additional Munsiff Srinagar. Against the judgment and decree defendant filed an appeal alongwith an application for condonation of delay as the appeal was delayed beyond prescribed period. The 3rd Addl; District and Session Judge dismissed the application for condonation of delay and consequently the appeal, by his order dated 17.6.2003. This order of dismissal is under challenge in this revision petition.
(2.) PLAINTIFF -respondents counsel has raised a preliminary objection to the maintainability of the revision on the ground that with the dismissal of the appeal by file appellate court the Judgment and decree of the trial court has merged with the order of the appellate court. Against the order of dismissal of the appeal 2nd appeal would lie on grounds specified thereto under Section 100 CPC but no revision would lie against the order.
(3.) KUNHAYAMMED v. State of Kerala, AIR 2000 SC 2587, in terms dealing with the question of doctrine of merger in the context of exercise of special jurisdiction of Supreme court under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, is not applicable to this case.