AMREEN MAGRAY Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A selection process was drawn on the request of Health Department by respondent No. 3 for selection and appointment of Dental Surgeons in the year 2009. A selection list was prepared by respondent No. 3 and selected candidates came to be appointed on 30th of December, 2009. Petitioner was not figuring in the said list, constraining her to approach the respondents to know about her fate. Ultimately respondent No. 3 made a recommendation and petitioner came to be selected and appointed vide Govt. Order No. 44 HME of 2010 dated 20th of January, 2010, she joined and accepted the said order. She has not questioned the said order till filing the writ petition in hand.

(2.) It appears that rules came to be amended and all those persons who came to be appointed by the Govt. in various departments after 1st January, 2010 are to be governed by the New Pension Scheme.

(3.) The grievance projected by the petitioner is that she was entitled to appointment along with other candidates vide order dated 30th of December, 2009, but due to lapses and mistakes committed by the respondents, she came to be selected and appointed later on i.e. 20th of January, 2010, thus is to be governed by old pension scheme and not by the new scheme which is in vogue from 2010.