(1.) THE appeal was already dismissed against Rule 3 and Rule 4 as proof of service of notice on them was not filed. So also no proof of service on the second respondent is filed.
(2.) HENCE the appeal against 2nd respondent is also dismissed.
(3.) THE first opposite party in C.D. No. 90/97 on the file of District Forum, Warangal is the appellant. The case of the complainant is that the 1st opposite party is a firm dealing in Gas. The complainant made an application for dealership by making deposit of Rs. 5,000/ -. On the assurance given by the 1st opposite party, complainant made all arrangements for establishment of the business by printing bill books, receipt books etc. But the 1st opposite party failed to supply gas. Hence he approached the District Forum.