(1.) Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners. The writ application has filed by the petitioners challenging the legality of three orders which are at Annexures-3,4 and 5.
(2.) The case of the petitioners is that they are jamabandi raiyats of Pradhani Village-Ballamdih and they are poor raiyats of the said village having very small areas of land, whereas, respondent No. 6 is the village Headman and respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are his brothers living jointly and respondent No.6 is also the Karta of the family, and they are in possession of a substantial portion of the land. In support of the said fact the petitioner has annexed certain khatian slips.
(3.) The further case of the petitioners is that respondent Nos. 4 and 5 filed a petition before the Divisional Officer, Dumka on 1st February, 1977 in which respondent No. 6 was made opposite party for settlement of lands and in the said proceeding the petitioner was not made a party. Thereafter, the petitioner came to know about the aforesaid prayer of the private respondents and they filed objection before the Sub-Divisional Officer in S.R. Case No. 601 of 1976/77 and the Sub-Divisional Officer by the order dated 17-11-1978 cancelled the said recommendation by the Circle Officer for settlement of plot of land in question in favour of the private respondents No. 4 and 5 or the ground that respondent Nos. 4 and 5 have large areas of lands, and the Sub-Divisional Officer was pleased to direct the Anchaladhikari to give reports on certain points which are mentioned in para 7 of the writ petition. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the aforesaid order for cancellation of the settlement in favour of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 the present impugned order at Annexure-3 has been passed by the S.D.O. recommending the settlement in favour of the said private respondents and the same amounts to review of the earlier order dated 17-11-1978.