(1.) There are two petitioners before this Court, one is the wife and the other is son. They have jointly moved the High Court for a direction upon the respondent State authorities to appoint petitioner no.
(2.) Md. Guddu on compassionate ground since the husband of petitioner no. 1 Asghar Ali died in harness while working as a Nalkoop Khalasi in P.H.E.D. Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. There cannot be any dispute that the husband of petitioner no. 1 was working as a work charge employee and his services never came to be regularised. However, petitioner no. 1 had earlier moved the High Court for payment of pension etc. in a writ application which was decided in her favour with a direction upon the State that looking at 19 years of services rendered by the husband of petitioner no. 1 and for the reasons indicated in the order contained in annexure -2 dated 05.05.2010 she would be entitled to pension and certain salary.
(3.) This judgment of the learned Single Judge was upheld by a Division Bench and S.L.P of the State has also been rejected by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Therefore, the issue with regard to pension must rest.