LAWS(PAT)-2025-9-1

KIRAN DEVI Vs. AKHILESH MISHRA

Decided On September 01, 2025
KIRAN DEVI Appellant
V/S
Akhilesh Mishra Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard the parties.

(2.) The present appeal has been filed under Sec. 19(1) of the Family Court Act, 1984 impugning the judgment and decree dtd. 25/2/2019 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Gopalganj in M.M Case No. 176 of 2011, whereby the matrimonial suit, preferred by the respondent No. 1, for a decree of divorce, on dissolution of marriage, has been allowed subject to payment of Rs.2,50,000.00 as permanent alimony for life support of the appellant.

(3.) The case of the respondent No. 1 as per petition filed before the Family Court is that the marriage of the appellant was solemnized with respondent No.1 in the month of May, 2005 as per the Hindu Rites and Custom. After the marriage, the appellant came to her matrimonial house and stayed there for few months and thereafter, she went to her parents' house and stayed there for a year. The respondent-husband and his father made several attempts to take the appellant to her matrimonial house, but all the efforts went in vein. Lastly in the month of June, 2006 the respondent No. 1 went to his Sasural along with some relatives on promise of his father-in-law and brother-in-law to sent the appellant with him but she did not come with the respondent No. 1. Later on, the respondent-husband came to know that appellant has illicit relationship with Ashok Sharma (respondent No. 2) who often used to visit the house of the appellant. The respondent-husband also came to know that appellant was pregnant and a female child was born who died just after the birth. The respondent-husband made several attempts to reconcile the matter with the appellant but all his efforts went in vein. The appellant, thereafter filed Complaint Case No. 2761 of 2009 against the respondent-husband and other family members which was registered as Bhore P.S. Case No. 2 of 2010 under Ss. 498(A), 406, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the aforesaid case, the respondent-husband and his father were rotting in jail for 6-7 months and ultimately after some time, on the intervention of relatives, a compromise was filed in the said case and appellant came to her Sasural but after sometime, the appellant went away from her Sasural with respondent No. 2. The respondent-husband further alleged that appellant and respondent-husband never cohabited since their marriage and appellant has completely deserted the matrimonial life of the respondent-husband. The respondent-husband, therefore, prayed that the marriage between the appellant and respondent No. 1 be declared dissolved and a decree of divorce be passed in his favour.