(1.) Learned Counsel for the Petitioners is permitted to withdraw the application so far as the Petitioner No. 1, Rakesh Sharma is concerned.
(2.) The Petitioners No. 2 and 3 who are the parents -in - law seek quashing of the order of cognizance dated 18.01.2010 passed by the Sub -Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in Complaint Case No. 397 of 2009.
(3.) The case of the Complainant is that she was married to the Petitioner No. 1 on 21.02.2003 on which occasion large number of gifts were given to the in -laws. While the Petitioner No. 1 was studying a course of Engineering the Petitioner No. 2 was posted as a Police Officer in Delhi. When she came to her in -laws' house. She was mentally tortured by everyone on the ground of bringing insufficient dowry. On 08.05.2004 a son was born who was aged about five years at the time of filing the Complaint. The allegation further was that the parents -in -law used to constantly demand more money for education of her husband, Petitioner No. 1. After the Petitioner No. 1 became a full -fledged Engineer he started working in Noida but the torture for non -fulfilment of dowry continued.