MADHUSUDAN PRASAD Vs. STATE OF BIHAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the appellant. No one represents the State or the private respondents inspite of valid service of notice.

(2.) THE appellant who is aggrieved by the order and judgment of this court dated 3 October, 1997 in C. W.J.C. No. 4141 of 1991 confines his prayer only to the extent that after the debarment period was over and he had completed the minimum requirement of teaching experience i.e., six years, as a tutor and as persons who were senior to him as Assistant Professors had already been promoted as Associate Professors, he being the senior most, his case was required to be considered for promotion as an Associate Professor, if and when the next vacancy arose as per Annexure -8 to the writ petition.

(3.) THE only aspect which is required to be considered now is as to whether in the list of Assistant Professors where the appellant is now below the respondents no. 6 and 10 and if they have either superannuated or have already been promoted as Associate Professor whether the petitioner appellant was required to be considered for promotion in the next existing vacancy of Associate Professor or not, if he was otherwise qualified. The debarment as the circular itself says is only for a limited period of three years. Subsequent thereto as the appellant has the minimum requisite qualification and also has the requisite teaching experience, and if a vacancy so exists, he is required to be considered for promotion in accordance with law, if no other person senior to him is still awaiting consideration.