(1.) Heard counsel for the parties.
(2.) The petitioner has challenged the communication, as contained in annexure 6 dated 15th July, 2000, whereby and whereunder his representation has been rejected refusing to appoint him on regular basis.
(3.) It appears that for the same self grievance, the petitioner earlier had come to this Court in CWJC No. 4410 of 1998 and this Court after examining the claim of the petitioner came to a conclusion that the petitioner was working on daily wages on contractual basis and payment, accordingly, was used to be made to him as per performance of his work and dismissed the writ application. The order passed by the learned single Judge of this Court was challenged in LPA No. 1241 of 1999, which also was dismissed with observation that if the State Government frames a scheme for regularisation of Class IV employees, the case of the petitioner should also be considered, if he is eligible for the same.