(1.) These two writ applications involving common question of fact and law are taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
(2.) These applications are directed against an order dt.8-8-1985 passed by Respondent No. 4, order dt. 9-8-1991 passed by Respondent No. 3 and the resolution dt. 27-7-1992 passed by Respondent No. 2 as contained in Annexures 1, 2 and 4 respectively whereby and whereunder an application for pre-emption filed by Respondent No. 5, Sita Ram Yadav was allowed.
(3.) The fact of the matter lies in a very narrow compass.