(1.) THE Appellants have been convicted under Section 395 IPC and sentenced to RI for seven years by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in S.Tr. No. 211/94/26/95 by judgment and order dated 06.08.1999.
(2.) THE case of the Informant is that on the night of 24/25.06.1992 while he was sleeping on his terrace 8 -10 persons committed dacoity in his house. In the light of electric bulb he claimed identification of the Appellant No. 1 who was his co -villager and could identify the rest if given an opportunity.
(3.) P .W. 1, Anirudh Tiwary is a hearsay witness who supported both the factum of dacoity as well as on the point of identification of the Appellant No. 1.