(1.) Heard learned Counsel for the appellant and learned Counsel for the State.
(2.) The contention basically is that upon her father's death on 19 June, 1987 admittedly the petitioner was a minor but in pursuance of an application she filed on 1 May, 1989 and again on 25 August, 1992 she was within the field of eligibility by having attained majority and to be considered in prsuance of a circular of the Government so issued in 1989.
(3.) The order on the writ petition is, to the effect, that upon death of a Government servant having occurred if a person applying is a minor then that person cannot be considered for a job on the ground of compassionate appointment. To this extent the judgment on the petition, the Court is afraid, is in-error.