(1.) Heard Mr. Vinay Mistry, the learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Rajat Kumar Tiwari for the State.
(2.) The appellant has challenged the order dtd. 2/1/2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 168 of 2015, whereby the order passed by the Licensing Officer-cum-Divisional Forest Officer, Gaya Forest Division, cancelling the licence of the petitioner to run the saw mill as also the appellate order dtd. 23/7/2014 passed by the Conservator of Forest-cum-Prescribed Officer, Gaya Circle, Gaya in Appeal Case No. 3 of 2014 have been affirmed and upheld.
(3.) The licence of the petitioner to run a saw mill has been cancelled on the sole ground that he has parted control of the saw mill to a person in whose favour he has executed a power of attorney.