(1.) ALL the above three appeals are being disposed of by a common judgment as they are having same Sessions Trial bearing No.12 of 2003.
(2.) PROSECUTION case initiated on the fard-bayan of one Vidya Nand Saha in brief is that his daughter Sarita Devi was married with accused appellant Binod Kumar Sah three years ago, she lived peacefully in her sasural for a period of six months, thereafter accused-appellants and others started to demand a motorcycle in dowry and caused cruelty followed by assault on her. Same was narrated by the informant's daughter, when she came to her parents with further disclosure that if they want to see the deceased living peacefully in her sasural, they should fulfill the demand of motorcycle. Informant along with his friend Md. Kurban went to his daughter's sasural fifteen days before puja, promised to purchase a motorcycle within 2-3 years after depositing its price. On which they (accused persons) assured not to treat cruelly with the deceased.
(3.) IN all, twelve (12) witnesses are examined in the case, they are PW-1 Pano Devi, PW-2 Dayawati Devi, PW-3 Asha Devi, PW-4 Dhaniya Devi, PW-5 Birendra Kumar, PW-6 Gopal Prasad, PW-7 Lila Nand Saha, PW-8 Md. Mofuzuddin, PW-9 Vidya Nand Saha, PW-10 Dr. Faijul Rahman, PW-11 Chandra Bhushan Saha and PW-12 Dropadi Devi, of them PWs-1 to 6 and 8 are stating to know nothing about the incident, they have been declared hostile, cross-examined by the prosecution also, but nothing has appeared in their statement either to corroborate prosecution case or to favour the defence. PWs-7, 9, 11 and 12 are only material witnesses to state the prosecution case.