(1.) It appears that the order dated 3.7.2012 suffers from error as it has been recorded that only the petitioner, State and respondent nos. 9 and 11 have been heard, however, Sh. Vinay Krishna Tripathy, learned counsel, had also appeared in this case on behalf of respondent nos. 4 to 6 and had also been heard.
(2.) The aforesaid order stands modified to the extent as above.
(3.) I have heard the parties on the issue of maintainability of this writ application.