LAWS(PAT)-2011-4-160

PASHUPATI NATH RAI Vs. STATE OF BIHAR

Decided On April 07, 2011
PASHUPATI NATH RAI Appellant
V/S
STATE OF BIHAR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE appellant nos.3 and 4 have been convicted u/ss.307 and 148 I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced to R.I. for seven years, one year and three years respectively, whereas the appellant nos.1, 2, 5 and 6 have been convicted u/s.307/149 I.P.C. and sentenced to R.I. for seven years and the appellant nos.1 and 6 have further been convicted u/s.148 I.P.C. and sentenced to R.I. for one year, whereas the appellant nos.2 and 5 have been convicted also u/s.148 I.P.C. and sentenced to R.I. for six months by a judgment dated 31.5.1994 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Saran, Chapra in Sessions Trial No.78 of 1981/ 46 of 1990.

(2.) THE prosecution case is that on 31.10.1980 a dispute arose between the parties over the house and property having been gifted to the wife of the informant and in course of which the accused persons are said to have variously assaulted the prosecution party and also fired at them. The defence of the appellants was that on 31.10.1980 at 11 A.M. when the accused persons went to harvest the paddy the prosecution party attempted to kill them and even charged on their house and in an attempt to save themselves the accused persons pelted stones, in course of which the prosecution party was injured and Baniapur P.S. case No.1710 of 1980 was instituted for this occurrence by the defence. The prosecution has examined seven witnesses, whereas the defence has examined six witnesses to prove the counter version. P.W.1 is the informant of the case, whereas P.W.2 is his wife and P.W.3 and P.W.4 are injured. P.W.5 is the doctor, who examined the two injured and was of the opinion that all the injuries were simple in nature. P.W.6 and P.W.7 are formal witnesses.