(1.) ALL things considered. The court did give notice to the counsel for the Electricity Board in this matter. The matter was, thus, adjourned to today.
(2.) CLEARLY , in this matter this is the third round of litigation. There had been an earlier decision dated 23.6.2000 on a writ petition by the petitioner -appellant on the same issues. This was on CWJC. No. 9363 of 1998: Vijay Kumar Agarwala vs. The Bihar State Electricity Board and others.
(3.) THEREAFTER , the petitioner appellant filed CWJC. No. 13195 of 2000: Vijay Kumar Agarwala vs.The Bihar State Electricity Board and others. On this learned judge passed an order dated 16 August 2001 declining to accept the contentions of the petitioner -appellant on the dispute as was being attempted to be raised. Issue raised by the petitioner -appellant to challenge any assertion that his load stood reduced from 60 to 39.HP was, in fact, not accepted by the court.