(1.) Heard, Mr. Rajendra Prasad Singh, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, at some detail, perused the petition, the Annexures as well as the counter -affidavit filed on behalf of the State.
(2.) In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of Annexure -6, an order of suspension dated 25.8.1990 passed under Rule 49 -A of the Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules (hereinafter referred to as the 'Appeal Rules').
(3.) The main thrust of arguments of the learned Counsel for the petitioner are three -fold: