(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
(2.) Earlier on 29.11.2017, the application on behalf of petitioner no. 1 was not pressed and, thus, it is restricted to petitioners no. 2 and 3.
(3.) Despite service of notice on Opposite Party No. 2, nobody appeared on her behalf when the case was taken up and heard.