LAWS(PAT)-2010-5-240

VISHNU SUGAR MILLS LTD. Vs. WEST BENGAL ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD.(A GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL UNDERTAKING) HAVING ITS OFFICE

Decided On May 10, 2010
VISHNU SUGAR MILLS LTD. Appellant
V/S
West Bengal Essential Commodities Supply Corporation Ltd.(A Government Of West Bengal Undertaking) Having Its Office Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Petitioner is a Public Limited Company engaged in manufacturing of sugar in the district of Gopalganj. They have challenged the communication dated 14.3.2008 issued by the West Bengal Essential Commodities Corporation Limited by virtue of which a sum of Rs. 2,93,175.72P has been deducted from the total payment of the claim of the petitioner against supply of levy sugar to the said Corporation. According to the petitioner the deduction made against the shortage allegedly of 192.40 quintals of sugar by the respondent Corporation is beyond their ambit and scope. Liability to pay to the petitioner is absolute and if there was any shortage or short supply that would amount to transit loss and the liability would be against the transporter i.e. the Railways in this case.

(2.) In terms of the notification dated 15.11.2007 issued by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, Government of India, the petitioner was directed to release levy sugar in favour of West Bengal Essential Commodities Supply Corporation Ltd. In terms of Annexure-2 the supplies were to be effected at two destinations which would be evident from Annexure-2. Stand of the petitioner is that the quantity so directed were duly loaded on the racks and despatched by the factory to the destinations and the above fact would be proved by the R.R. receipts issued by the Railways in this regard. Once the goods were loaded and delivered the shortage becomes the liability of the transporter and the sugar company cannot be penalised for shortages in transit. In this case West Bengal Corporation has taken an easy way-out by deducting a sum of Rs. 2,93,175/-.

(3.) Notices have been issued upon the respondent Corporation and had been validly served but they have not bothered to appear or defend themselves. There is apppearance on behalf of the Railways but he submits that the concerned Railways in this regard would be North Eastern Railways or North East Frontier Railway. In addition, no claim has ever been lodged before the Railways by the said Corporation at any point of time and, therefore, at this stage they have no obligation.