(1.) Heard Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Counsel for the State. No body has appeared on behalf of the opposite party.
(2.) The applicant-wife is aggrieved by the amount of maintenance fixed under the impugned order dated 5.2.2008. She has, therefore, approached this Court for enhancement of the said amount.
(3.) From a perusal of the order impugned, it appears that on a consideration of the materials on record, the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Gaya directed for payment of a sum of Rs. 3,000/-per month to the Petitioner as maintenance.