LAWS(HPH)-2019-9-224

ANMOL SHARMA Vs. VIKRANT SETH

Decided On September 06, 2019
Anmol Sharma Appellant
V/S
Vikrant Seth Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Plaintiff being unsuccessful before learned Courts below in establishing that suit property was coparcenary and therefore, sale of same effected by his father (defendant No. 2 Suresh Kumar) in favour of defendant No. 1 was null and void, preferred present Regular Second Appeal.

(2.) This appeal was admitted on 26.11.2007, on the following substantial questions of law:-

(3.) I have heard Mr. I.S. Chandel, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Bhupender Gupta, learned senior counsel, for respondent No. 1, and carefully gone through the record.