LAWS(HPH)-2007-6-97

MOHAN MEAKIN LTD. Vs. STATE OF H.P.

Decided On June 27, 2007
MOHAN MEAKIN LTD Appellant
V/S
State Of H P And Ors Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This judgment shall dispose of the writ petition No. 251 of 1999 filed by the petitioner Mohan Meakin Ltd. This judgment shall also dispose of the writ petition filed by the petitioner in CWP No. 590 of 1999 since the common question of law and facts are involved in both these writ petitions.

(2.) Briefly stated the facts of CWP No. 251 of 1999 are that the petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act having its registered office in Solan Brewery and is carrying on the business of manufacture and sale of Indian Made Foreign Liquors, (I.M.F.S.) and beers etc. It was alleged that the petitioner company is having a Distillery at Kasauli in Solan District holding a licence in Form D-2. It was further alleged that for blending of Malt Spirit produced at Kasauli Distillery, petitioner imported some quantities of Malt Spirit of over proof strength from its own Distillery at Mohan Nagar in Uttar Pradesh, after getting import permits from the Collector Excise, Himachal Pradesh. The petitioner also transported some quantities of Malt Spirit of over proof strength from M/s. Rangar Breweries Ltd., Mehatpur, Distt. Una as well as some quantities of spirit from its Distillery at Mohan Nagar, Distt. Ghaziabad to Solan Brewery during the year 1997-98 and 1998-99.

(3.) It was further alleged that prior to 1.4.1996 there was no provision which required payment of permit/transport fee on transportation of I.M.F.S., country spirit, beer etc. It was alleged that it was for the first time that permit/transport fee was levied as per announcement for excise auctions for the year 1996-97 dated 12.3.1996. It was alleged that as per the letter issued by the Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh, a permit fee at the rate of Rs. 2.50 per bulk litres on denatured spirit, Rs. 2.00 per proof litre and Rs. 1.00 per proof litre on foreign spirit and country liquor respectively was leviable. It was alleged that the permit fee was payable at the time of grant of permission and transport of liquor. A notification was issued in view of the above letter of Excise and Taxation Commissioner Shimla vide which the rates mentioned above were payable by a person who makes an application for the grant of permission to import and/or transport of the foreign liquor or country liquor or both. It was alleged that this fee was inserted by Notification dated 23.3.1996 but no permit/transport fee was charged by excise authorities at the time of issuing import permits for import of Malt Spirit from Mohan Meakin Limited, Mohan Nagar (U.P.) and accordingly vide letter dated 28.10.1997, the then Excise and Taxation Officer had asked the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs. 8,21,992/- on account of the permit fee on the spirit imported by the petitioner during the year 1996-97. This was followed by other memos and the petitioner was finally asked to deposit sum of Rs. 17,68,346/- upto 6.2.1999, failing which this amount will be declared as an arrear of land revenue and will be recoverable as such.