LAWS(HPH)-2007-3-31

ANIL VEKTA Vs. STATE OF H P

Decided On March 26, 2007
Anil Vekta Appellant
V/S
STATE OF H P Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE short question involved in this petition revolves around the interpretation to be given to sub-clause (1) of Rule 84-A of the Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj (Election) Rules, 1994. The relevant portion of the rule reads as follows:

(2.) THE undisputed facts are that elections to various wards of Gram Panchayat Devarighat were held sometime in December, 2005. It is not disputed that there were seven wards in this Panchayat. Ward No.3 was reserved for schedule caste. Elections to Ward No.3 could not be held because no person actually contested the election, though some persons had filed nomination papers but later on they withdrew their candidature. As such, there was no candidate from this Ward. Thereafter, elections for the post of Pradhan of the Panchayat were held which were not challenged. Elections to post of Up-Pradhan were fixed for 30.01.2006. The present petitioner filed the present petition on 27th January, 2006. The contention raised by Sh. YPS Dhaulta, Advocate, is that Sub Divisional Officer(Civil) or any other officer duly authorized by him in terms of sub rule (1) of Rule 84-A of the Act is bound to call a meeting of all elected members of Gram Panchayat to elect one of its members to be the Up-Pradhan of the Gram Panchayat. According to Mr.YPS Dhaulta, Advocate, no ward election to Ward No.3 had taken place as nobody had fought the election, therefore, when the authorized officer called the meeting, he had not called the meeting of all the elected members.

(3.) THERE can be various occasions, when the election to a particular Ward cannot be held. The whole election process to the higher office cannot be brought to grinding halt just because elections to one of the wards has not taken place. In case any other interpretation is given to the phrase "all elected members" it would result in a situation of leaving the higher office vacant for long period of time. This was not and could never have been the intention of the Legislature. In fact the word "elected" as used in the phrase "all elected persons" clearly shows that only those persons who have been duly elected have to be called for the meeting.