ABHISHEK GULERI Vs. STATE OF H.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Janesh Mahajan, learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, respectively.

(2.) With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard at this stage.

(3.) Petitioners' grievance is that their representations, annexed with the respective writ petitions, seeking applicability of Ghanshyam Dass and others Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others[CWP No.2056 of 2023, decided alongwith connected matters on 21/3/2024], have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/ competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents are not averse to this prayer.