BABU RAM Vs. SATYA DEVI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) We have heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant.

(2.) This intra-court Special Appeal has been filed against the judgment of learned Single Judge dated 13.02.2015, by which she has dismissed the writ petition, against the order dated 22.01.2013, cancelling the candidature of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Agriculture Supervisor. Learned Single Judge found that the petitioner did not appear for verification of the documents on the date fixed on 15.01.2013, and did not accept the contention that since he was in judicial custody, in respect of a criminal case, he could not have informed the respondents about his inability to remain present on that date. It was further found that the petitioner had knowledge about the cancellation of his candidature in Feb., 2013, and presented a writ petition in March, 2014, without any satisfactory explanation for delay.

(3.) It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the appellant that the appellant did not have any knowledge of the date, on which he had to appear for verification of the documents. He was in judicial custody in a criminal case, in which he was acquitted, and further that, he was waiting for the decision on his representation, on which a verification was sought about his arrest and remaining in judicial custody from the District Superintendent of Police, Bundi. On receiving the letter from the District Superintendent of Police, Bundi on 19.09.2013, by the Joint Director, Agriculture (Administration), Jaipur, when the appointment was not given, he approached the High Court.