NARESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF H.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal is directed against judgment and order, dated 5th July, 2010, made by the learned Single Judge in CWP (T) No. 8711 of 2008, titled as Smt. Kamla Sharma versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, whereby the writ petition filed by the writ petitioner respondent No. 5 herein came to be allowed and the appointment of writ respondent No. 5-appellant as Part Time Water Carrier in Government Primary School, Blog, was quashed and set aside (for short "the impugned judgment").

(2.) The learned Single Judge has made discussion/observation in para 6 of the impugned judgment that warding of five marks by the Selection Committee to the appellant-writ respondent No. 5 was legally incorrect as his two brothers were in the employment of the State Government.

(3.) We have gone through the Scheme, which was occupying the field at the relevant point of time, wherein it has been specifically provided that if any family member of a person is in Government employment, he cannot be awarded marks under the category of candidate belonging to unemployed family.