RAJENDER KUMAR Vs. STATE OF H.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By way of instant Execution Petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioners for issuance of directions to the respondents for implementation and execution of the order/judgment dt. 16/6/2025 passed by this Court in CWP No.9605 of 2025, titled as Rajender Kumar & others Vs. State of H.P. & another.

(2.) Careful perusal of aforesaid order/judgment, sought to be executed in the present proceedings, reveals that this Court, while disposing of the writ petition filed by the petitioners, directed the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in light of judgment passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.5043 of 2022, titled as Sunita Sangroli Vs. State of H.P and Others within four weeks. Since, despite there being specific direction to do the needful, as taken note herein above, respondents failed to comply with the judgment, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings.

(3.) Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, while accepting notice on behalf of the respondents, states that though he has every reason to believe and presume that by now aforesaid orders, sought to be executed, must have been complied with, but if not, same would be complied with within a period of three weeks from today.