VINOD KUMAR WALIA Vs. PRESIDING JUDGE LABOUR COURT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner, who is a Diploma Holder in Mechanical Engineering, was appointed as an Assistant Engineer by respondent No. 2 Company vide appointment letter dated January 30, 1991 (Annexure P-2). Such appointment was on probation for a period of six months, which period of probation was extendable. The term regarding probation as contained in paras 8 and 9 of the appointment letter, Annexure P-2 is to the following effect:

(2.) Since the work and performance of the petitioner was not found to be satisfactory, his services were terminated with effect from September 14, 1991 by order dated September 12, 1991 (Annexure P- 3).

(3.) On an industrial dispute having been raised by the petitioner, the following reference was made by the appropriate Government under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Court for adjudication: