(1.) The present appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dtd. 11/3/2022, passed by learned District Judge, Kangra, at Dharamshala, vide which the appeal filed by the appellant (plaintiff before the learned Trial Court) was dismissed as not maintainable. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the similar manner in which they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)
(2.) Since the limited question is being decided; therefore, the facts as are necessary for the disposal of the present appeal are being considered.
(3.) Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the plaintiffs filed a civil suit before the learned Trial Court seeking a declaration that the suit land mentioned in the plaint is exclusively owned and possessed by the plaintiff. A consequential relief of permanent prohibitory injunction for restraining the defendants from interfering with the suit land was also sought. It was asserted that the suit land was partitioned vide mutation no. 411. The plaintiff is in exclusive possession of the same after partition. The defendants started interference with the possession of the plaintiff. They were requested not to do so but in vain. Hence, the suit was filed for relief as mentioned above.