RAKHI SHARMA Vs. HIMACHAL PRADESH UNIVERSITY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE complaint is that once the petitioner was BCA-IIIrd allowed to appear in year supplementary examination, held in the month of October, 2012, the respondent-University could have not withheld her result for any reason whatsoever and that withholding of her result by the respondent-University is highly illegal, arbitrary and also against the principles of natural justice. Hence, this writ petition with the following prayer:-

(2.) THE case, as set out in the writ petition is that the petitioner after having qualified for BCA Ist year examination in the month of April, 2012 had enrolled herself in BCA-IIIrd year. The respondent-University though failed to issue roll number to her, however, she was allowed to appear in the examination as per University Rules as a stray case candidate. In support of such contentions the petitioner has placed reliance on BCA IInd year detail marks card, Annexure P-1 and Annexure P-2, the sheets whereby the Centre Superintendent of Palampur Examination Centre had forwarded the answer sheets of the candidates who appeared in supplementary examination of BCA final year held in the month of October, 2012. However, when her result was not declared, she made the representation, Annexure P-3, which has been returned to her with the remarks "1st year passed in April 2012" "not eligible to appear in October, 2012/out of session". Aggrieved from withholding of her result, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition.

(3.) IT is in this back-drop, we have gone through the record and also heard learned counsel on both sides.