(1.) Heard.
(2.) By way of this appeal, the appellant has challenged the judgment passed by the Court of learned Commissioner, in petition No.162/11, titled as Smt. Parvina Kumari vs. Additional Superintending Engineer, dtd. 30/10/2012, in terms whereof, the petition preferred by the respondent herein under Sec. 22 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, has been allowed by the learned Commissioner, in the following terms:-
(3.) This appeal was admitted on 20/7/2022 on the following substantial question of law:-