LAWS(HPH)-2022-2-61

GAURAV KAKKAR Vs. ARUN BANSAL

Decided On February 21, 2022
Gaurav Kakkar Appellant
V/S
Arun Bansal Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Petitioners-defendants, by way of present petition, have assailed impugned order dtd. 11/12/2019 passed by learned Senior Civil Judge Kasauli, whereby application filed by respondent No.1- plaintiff, under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C, seeking amendment of the plaint for adding alternative prayer in the head note and prayer clause of the plaint, has been allowed.

(2.) Parties herein, for convenience, shall be referred here-in- after as plaintiff and defendants, according to their status in the Civil Suit. Respondent No.1 is plaintiff, whereas petitioners are contesting defendants No. 1 and 2 and respondent No.2 is proforma defendant.

(3.) Plaintiff, being purchaser in a sale agreement executed between him and defendants No. 1 and 2, has filed a Civil Suit for Specific Performance of the contract and for Mandatory Injunction and Possession.