STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs. SUNIL KUMAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE present Criminal Appeal has come up for adjudication after the grant of leave to appeal under Section 378 (3) of the Code of criminal Procedure in reference to judgment dated 16.12.2006, passed by Learned Sessions Judge, Solan, Camp at Nalagarh, H.P., in Sessions Trial No.9-NL/7 of 2006, acquitting the alleged accused/respondents under Section 20 of the Narcotic Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short `NDPS Act'), in reference to FIR No.34 of 2005 dated 4.3.2005.

(2.) THE prosecution case, in brief, is that on 4.3.2005, at about 9.25 PM, the police party apprehended the accused- respondents and recovered 920 grams of charas from their possession. Two samples of 15 grams each were taken out from the recovered charas and sealed with seal impression `A'. Remaining bulk was also sealed with same seal. On 5.3.2005, one sealed sample was sent for chemical examination. Keeping in view the Chemical Examiner's report and the investigation, accused were charged for the aforesaid offence.

(3.) ON analysis of the prosecution witnesses and material on record, learned Sessions Judge, Solan, Camp at Nalagarh, has arrived at the finding that the prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Inter alia on many other grounds, one important aspect which requires consideration is that on perusal of Ex.PW.10/O, it appears that `NCB Form' was not filled in, on the spot. The Chemical Examiner has opined that on microscopic examination cystolithic hair were found present. Beam alkaline test was found positive and resin was found 31.02%. In these circumstances, the Chemical Examiner has opined that contraband good so recovered was charas.