KIRAN BALA Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for releasing the petitioner on bail in FIR No. 240/2011 dated 18.10.2011, registered at Police Station, Sadar, Nahan under Sections 498A, 328, 307, 34 IPC. It has been submitted that petitioner had applied for grant of bail before the learned Sessions Judge, Sirmaur which was rejected on 24.1.2012. The petitioner is an old woman suffering from various ailments. The petitioner remained admitted in hospital from 24.1.2012 to 30.1.2012. The petitioner is innocent, she has been falsely implicated in the case. The petitioner is not in good terms with his son and the complainant. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in the case on account of registration of the case. It has been stated that petitioner is ready to join the investigation and furnish bail bonds in accordance with the directions of this Court. The submission has been made for releasing the petitioner on bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

(2.) THE status report has been filed. It has been stated that there are in all three accused namely Navpreet, Akashdeep and Kiran Bala ( petitioner). The two other accused have already been released on bail. The learned Addl. Advocate General has stated that investigation in the case is complete and only challan is to be prepared. The case has been registered on the statement of Mamta recorded under Section 154 Cr.P.C. She has stated that she was married on 19.9.2010 with Navpreet. She has alleged that after about 20 days of marriage her husband Navpreet started quarreling with her on small matters. He started demanding dowry but with the intervention of the relatives the matter was sorted out between her and her husband. She has alleged that petitioner had threatened that she would not allow the complainant to live in the matrimonial home.

(3.) THE complainant has alleged that petitioner and her husband put some liquid in her mouth and thereafter she became unconscious. The husband of the petitioner has already been released on bail. It has not been pointed out that alleged part played by the petitioner is more serious then the part played by the husband of the complainant for the commission of offence. It appears from the medical slip that petitioner remained admitted in hospital for some time from 24.1.2012 to 30.1.2012. The investigation in the case is complete. There is no allegations in the status report that petitioner is not co -operating in the investigation. The petitioner is woman and therefore, she is entitled to special consideration under Section 437 Cr.P.C. for the purpose of bail. The petitioner has made out a case for grant of bail.