ASHA Vs. STATE OF H.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS application has been filed, under Section 439, Code of Criminal Procedure, for releasing the applicant on bail, in case FIR No. 66 of 2011, under Sections 307, 324, 506 Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station, Rohru. The status report has been filed.

(2.) THE learned Counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that Petitioner has been arrested on 10.6.2011 in pursuance of complaint lodged by Smt. Rewati on the allegations that complainant had quarrel with the Petitioner. The Petitioner picked up "Draft" and tried to hit Smt. Rewati, who saved herself but "Draft" landed on her hand as a result complainant sustained injuries. It has been submitted that prosecution case is false. The Petitioner is innocent, she has committed No. offence. No. recovery is to be made from her and she is ready to abide by the terms of bail in case she is released on bail. It has also been stated that Petitioner earlier filed an application, under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure, which has been dismissed by the learned Fast Track Court, Shimla camp at Rohru on 10.6.2011.

(3.) I have considered the rival contentions of the learned Counsel for the parties. It has been stated by learned Addl. Advocate General that investigation in the case is complete, the challan has been submitted on 3.8.2011. The applicant was arrested on 10.6.2011 and since then she is in custody. The trial will take some time. No. purpose will be served by keeping the Petitioner in detention for indefinite period. Section 437 Code of Criminal Procedure gives special concession to women for bail in certain circumstances. The complainant has received injury on her palm. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicant has made out a case for grant of bail. Accordingly, the application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on bail in case FIR No. 66/2011, dated 4.6.2011 under Sections 307, 324, 506 Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station, Rohru, on her furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/ - with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of any Judicial Magistrate stationed at Rohru, subject to the conditions that applicant shall not tamper the prosecution evidence or terrorise the prosecution witnesses in any manner.