NAND LAL Vs. STATE OF H.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioners claim work charge status, arrears and other consequential benefits from the date they completed eight years of service. Reliance is placed on the decision of this Court date 28th July, 2010 rendered in Rakesh Kumar versus state of H.P. and others,CWP No. 2735 of 2010.

(2.) THE learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioners may file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the second respondent within a period of one month from today. The second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The petitioners will produce a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the judgment referred to in this judgment while submitting the representation(s). The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s) if any.