DHANI RAM & ANOTHER Vs. SIDHARTH ACHARYA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE complaint of the petitioner is that the order dated 20th July, 2010 passed in CMP No. 6414 of 2010 has been willfully violated by the respondent. This Court had granted the interim order, as prayed for. The prayer was for stay of the execution of the orders, Annexure P -2 restraining the 6th respondent from pursuing the remedy of getting the entries changed in view of the order, Annexure P -2. Admittedly, there is no case that the 6th respondent has made any efforts thereafter for changing the entries. The complaint is that the Tehsildar did not refer to the orders passed by this Court and demolished the green house with barbed wire. In the affidavit filed by the respondent, it is stated that there were proceedings pending between the parties under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and he only implemented the orders passed by the Executive Magistrate. It is also stated in the affidavit at para 7 that the respondent had no specific knowledge of the orders passed by the Court and that the orders under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were still in force and that the respondent only implemented the orders under Section 133 Cr.P.C. In the affidavit, it is also stated as follows:

(2.) THE writ petition is still pending. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also the apologetic stand taken by the respondent in the affidavit, we find no wilful disobedience or contumacious conduct on the part of the respondent. It is certainly open to the petitioner to pursue his grievances as referred to in the writ petition on merits.