LAWS(HPH)-2011-1-2

NARINDER SINGH Vs. STATE OF H P

Decided On January 03, 2011
NARINDER SINGH Appellant
V/S
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY means of this petition, the petitioners who are the members of the Managing Committee of the Lalri Cooperative Agriculture Service Society (hereinafter referred to as the `Society') have challenged the order, Annexure P/1 whereby the Additional Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Dharamshala quashed the amendment made in the bye-laws of the Society and issued show cause notice based on such order.

(2.) BRIEFLY stated, the facts of the case are that as per the bye-laws of the Society, the value of each share was Rs.10/-. In a meeting of the General House allegedly held on 12.3.2008, this value was increased from Rs.10/- to Rs.1000/-. It is not disputed that this amendment to the bye-laws was duly accepted by the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies. Thereafter, elections to the Managing Committee were held and only people who had shares worth Rs.1000/- and more were permitted to contest and take part in the elections. The petitioners were duly elected. It appears that some persons including the respondents Nos.5 and 6 had filed representations before the various authorities under the Cooperative Societies Act against the amendment in the bye-laws. When no action was taken on their representations, they filed a Writ Petition and this Writ Petition being CWP No.1811 of 2009 was disposed of on 23.11.2009 with a direction that the authorities to whom the representation was made shall decide the same and take a consequential decision within a period of eight weeks from 23.11.2009. It appears that such decision was not taken and thereafter, a Contempt Petition was filed. After the Contempt Petition was filed, the respondents passed the order, Annexure P/1 dated 21st June, 2010. According to the petitioners, this order has been passed in a hot haste and was only passed as a result of the pressure exerted due to the filing of the Contempt Petition.

(3.) A preliminary objection has been raised that this petition is not maintainable since the petitioners have an alternative efficacious remedy available to them.