REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

DINESH CHANDER SHARMA Appellant

V/S

NIRMALA DEVI Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

COOPER VS. WILSON [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT BANK LIMITED DELHI VS. EMPLOYEES OF BHARAT BANK LTD [REFERRED TO]
MAQBOOL HUSSAIN VS. STATE OF BOMBAY [REFERRED TO]
S A VENKATARANAN PETITIONER VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
PRITAM SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF BOMBAY VS. S L APTE [REFERRED TO]
MANIPUR ADMINISTRATION MANIPUR VS. THOKCHOM BIRA SINGH [REFERRED TO]
ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS BOMBAY BEHRAMJI MERWANJI DAMANIA VS. L R MELWANI :L R MELWANI [REFERRED TO]
WORKMEN OF GUJARAT ELECTRICITY BOARD BARODA VS. GUJARAT ELECTRICITY BOARD BARODA [REFERRED TO]
BHANU KUMAR JAIN VS. ARCHANA KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
KOLLA VEERA RAGHAV RAO VS. GORANTLA VENKATESWARA RAO [REFERRED TO]
SANGEETABEN MAHENDRABHAI PATEL VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Challenging the judgment of acquittal, passed by the Sessions Court, Una, affirming the order of dismissal of complaint under Section 203 CrPC, passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Una, the complainant, who is practicing as an Advocate, has come up before this Court, seeking directions to proceed against the accused- respondent, for commission of offences punishable under Sections 119, 170, 323, 355, 452, 500, 504, 506-II/149 of IPC.

(2.) The gist of the facts apposite to adjudicate the present petition traces its history to an incident, which had taken place on November 21, 1999. The complainant alleged in the complaint, filed on September 21, 2007, filed after a gap of more than seven years, as follows: -

(3.) On the above facts, the complainant alleged in the complaint that accused persons committed the following acts: -

Click here to view full judgment.

DINESH CHANDER SHARMA Vs. NIRMALA DEVI

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address