LAWS(NCLT)-2017-11-38

KAMLESH KALIDAS SHAH Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA

Decided On November 04, 2017
Kamlesh Kalidas Shah Appellant
V/S
STATE BANK OF INDIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This Petition was filed before the then CLB in the month of March 2015 by invoking the provisions of section 58(4) of Companies Act 2013 for transfer of shares claimed to have been purchased by the Petitioner.

(2.) Facts in brief as stated in the Petition were that the Petitioner is in the business of share brokerage as a share broker. The Petitioner had purchased 200 shares of State Bank of India (Respondent No.l) through Ahmedabad Stock Exchange of 50 denomination each from the following persons:-

(3.) The above listed shares of State Bank of India totalling 200 in number, claimed to have been purchased through Ahmedabad Stock Exchange. The Petitioner had made an attempt to get some shares transferred in his name, however, due to mismatch of signatures the Bank had refused to transfer those shares and put "Stop mark". We shall discuss the merits and facts of the case but before that a legal question has been raised that this Petition is not maintainable against the State Bank of India being not incorporated as a Company under the provisions of the Companies Act. This legal question is to be answered first, because of the reason that the Respondent No.l i.e. State Bank of India, had vehemently opposed the maintainability of this Petition. From the side of the Bank, Learned Representatives were present time to time and pleaded to dismiss this Petition because no cause of action had arisen under the facts against the Bank being not a Company as defined under the Companies Act.