IN RE Vs. ANKITA PRATISTHAN LIMITED AND ORS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Under consideration are seven company application Nos. CA/95 to 101/CAA/2017 filed under Sections 230 to 232 and other applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

(2.) There are 2 preference shareholders in the Applicant Company, whose consent affidavits are attached at page No. 220 to 227. Therefore, there is no requirement for holding the meeting of the preferential shareholders.

(3.) There are no secured and unsecured creditors in the applicant company as per certificate of the Chartered Accountant, DP Kapoor & Co., attached at page No. 228. Therefore, there is no requirement for holding the meeting of secured as well as unsecured creditor.