STATE OF HARYANA Vs. BALJIT KAUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE aforementioned revision petition was decided by me vide order dated 26.3.1999.

(2.) THE respondents have moved this application, CM No. 26 of 1998-99, under Sections 151 and 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking suitable modifications in the operative portion of the aforesaid order dated 26.3.1999.

(3.) I have heard counsel for both parties and have carefully perused the order dated 26.3.1999. The counsel for the respondents submitted that quite obviously the operative paragraph of the order leaves no manner of doubt that the Court intended to dismiss the revision petition and that the revision petition had in fact, been dismissed but that the word 'accepted' is either a typing error or happened to be used in the order inadvertently since it does not follow from the operative portion of the order and does not at all express the intention of the Court. Therefore this inadvertent error requires to be corrected and the order modified accordingly.