(1.) THIS revision petition is directed against the order of the Additional District Judge, Ambala, dated November 17, 1988, whereby the order of the executing Court dated November 28, 1987, dismissing the execution application was set aside, with the observations :-
(2.) AT the time of the motion hearing, it was contended on behalf of Devi Dayal, objector, that the appeal before the Additional District Judge was not maintainable.
(3.) THE learned counsel for the parties are not aware whether the said suit is still pending or has been finally disposed of. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of this case, the objector Devi Dayal, could not be ejected in execution of the ejectment order obtained by Sohan Lal against Siri Ram. According to the learned counsel, the warrants issued by the executing Court for possession of the suit property were wrong and illegal.