REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Kewal Chand Jain Appellant

V/S

Jiwan Kumar Kaushal Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

NANAK CHAND V. SANSAR CHAND AND ANR [REFERRED TO]
SADHU RAM V. NIRANJAN DASS AND ANR [REFERRED TO]
NARINDER NATH SAINI V. PREM PARKASH KAUR [REFERRED TO]
PUSHPA DEVI V. JIWAN DASS [REFERRED TO]
MADAN LAL SAGGI AND ANR. V. BRITISH MOTOR CAR CO [REFERRED TO]
KHUSHI RAM V. OM PARKASH [REFERRED TO]
PAL BUSHAR V. DAWA [REFERRED TO]
ASSOCIATED HOTELS OF INDIA LIMITED VS. R N KAPOOR [REFERRED TO]
DIPAK BANERJEE VS. LILABATI CHAKRABORTY [REFERRED TO]
KHALIL AHMED BASHIR AHMED VS. TUFELHUSSEIN SAMASBHAJI SARANGPURWALA [REFERRED TO]
RAJBIR KAUR VS. S CHOKESIRI AND CO [REFERRED TO]
OM PAL VS. ANAND SWARUP [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH CHAND VS. OM PARKASH [REFERRED TO]
TIRVENI DEVI VS. BABU LAL [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE tenant has impugned the order dated Sept. 7, 1988, for ejectment by the Appellate Authority. The factual matrix relevant for the decision of this revision petition is :-

(2.) THE ejectment of the petitioners was sought by the respondents, inter alia, on the grounds of subletting by Kewal Chand to Nasib, structurally changing the demised premises resulting in material impairment of its value and utility and the premises becoming unfit for human habitation.

(3.) THE Rent Controller, on appreciation of oral as well as documentary evidence, came to the conclusion that there was no subletting as there was no transfer of exclusive possession nor creation of interest of Nasib in the premises was proved; the building was fit for human habitation; no changes had been made nor any impairment in its value and utility had taken place. Nasib was found to be the servant of Kewal Chand. Resultantly, ejectment was declined.

Click here to view full judgment.

KEWAL CHAND JAIN Vs. JIWAN KUMAR KAUSHAL

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address