ATTO Vs. BALWANT KAUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Notice of motion was issued in this case. The petitioner has alleged that the learned Sub-Judge had no authority in law to extend the time for depositing the mortgage amount.

(2.) Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to this petition are as under :-

(3.) It is stated at the Bar by Mr. Aggarwal, counsel for the respondent, that the mortgage amount was deposited on 6th January, 1979.