BALBIR SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. JAGRUP SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS second appeal must succeed in view of the Full Bench decision of this Court in Moti Ram and others v. Bakhwant Singh and others . The Full Bench decision over -ruled the Division Bench decision in Surjan Singh v. Harcharan Singh. The Courts below relied upon this decision in decreeing the plaintiff's suit. The vendees and the pre -emptor are related as follows:

(2.) THE lard in dispute was sold by Gurnam Singh, real brother of Jagrup Singh to his step -brothers Balbir Singh and others. The sale was pre -empted by Jagrup Singh. In view of the Division Bench decision in Surjan Singh's case, the suit was decreed. The vendees' defence is that their status is equal to that of the vendor. In view of the Full Bench decision, there is no distinction between a full -brother and a half -brother for the purpose of pre -emption law. Therefore, the status of the pre -emptor is equal to that of the vendees. It is a fundamental rule of pre -emption law that a pre -emptor can only succeed if his right is superior to that of the vendees. In view of the Full Bench decision, it cannot be held that the right of the pre -emptor is superior to that of the vendees.

(3.) MR . Naginder Singh next contended that the Full Bench decision has laid down a wrong proposition of law and I should refer the case to a larger Bench. In my opinion, that is not necessary, because I would be certifying this case as a fit one for a Letters Patent appeal and this matter Mr. Naginder Singh can reagitate before the larger Bench if his appeal is admitted and heard.