(1.) By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order of the learned appellate court, reversing the order of the trial court (Civil Judge, (Jr. Divn), Ludhiana), dtd. 21/1/2013, such order having been passed on applications filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC by both, the plaintiffs as also the present petitioner who is the defendant-counter -claimant in the suit.
(2.) The dispute is with regard to what is contended to be a rasta, and as per the learned trial court, is also shown in the revenue record as such.
(3.) The trial court in its order dtd. 21/1/2013 having held that the passage in question has been shown to be the private property of the present petitioner, i.e. the counter-claimant, with the respondents-plaintiffs having no right to use it, restrained them from interfering in the peaceful possession of the petitioner.